The number of well-intended
websites that help individuals and caregivers create advance directives seems
to be increasing on a monthly basis.
The majority of these websites focus on the critical initial
conversation regarding what is important to you during your end of life. The idea is that the more an individual
shares about their desires, their wishes, the less stress and anxiety by the
family, friends, and caregivers.
Great. Do these AD documents
result in less stress and anxiety and a better end of life?
What is an AD?
End-of-life
planning usually includes making choices about the following:
·
The goals of care (for example, whether to use
certain medicines during the last days of life)
·
Where you want to spend your final days
·
Which treatments for end-of-life care you wish
to receive
The laws governing advance
directives vary from state to state, so it is important to complete and sign
advance directives that comply with your state's law. Also, advance
directives can have different titles in different states. One state’s advance directive does not always
work in another state. Some states do honor advance directives from another
state; others will honor out-of-state advance directives as long as they are
similar to the state's own law; and some states do not have an answer to this
question. The best solution is if you spend a significant amount of time in
more than one state, you should complete the advance directives for all the
states you spend a significant amount of time in
Recent studies have found that
there are several key steps to the Advance Directive Process and several life
stages that they impact. Let’s discuss
life stages first, as the process is significantly different depending on where
you are at because the tools to support the AD process vary depending on where
a patient falls on this spectrum:
Healthy -> Potential Life Threatening
-> Life Threatening -> Hospice -> End of Life
For a healthy person at the left
end of this spectrum, tools regarding goals of care may be considering decisions
for comfort versus improved function/rehabilitation versus life prolongation,
and the choice of a proxy decision maker(s) who can communicate these values. These
tools involve making decisions for hypothetical health states the person has
not yet experienced. People who have not experienced a serious event may have a
tenuous understanding about the health states for which decisions are being
made. These decisions differ from end-of-life decisions because they require
people to imagine what life would be like under various conditions of
disability, whereas within end-of-life decisions, the patient is directly
experiencing the alternative to death.
Based on my research, the majority
of website AD tools are designed for healthy people and they produce some great
documents. However, a recent email I
received stated that “even if the AD is completed, known, and even
accessible (miracle to this point I know) – Is it CONSUMABLE to the ED (Emergency
Department) practitioners? 10 page narrative paper or PDF
documents are not always very helpful to the busy clinician…. especially if
they are at the point of considering life-saving / extending procedures.” Does this means is that if we do not produce
an AD document that is usable by the Emergency Department then it is the same
as one does not even exist?
I am very concerned. What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment