Building Stronger Employee Engagement for Quality Excellence
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/building-stronger-employee-engagement-quality-john-m-cachat-ofose/
High-Impact Consulting for Manufacturing & Service Industries
Building Stronger Employee Engagement for Quality Excellence
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/building-stronger-employee-engagement-quality-john-m-cachat-ofose/
Recording – Harrington “Quality Cost 4.0 From Theory to Deployment” Event (37min)
Cost of Quality theorists have been for decades seeking an
approach for a practical deployment of Quality Costs process. Quality 4.0 provides the opportunity to make
this happen across a variety of businesses.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/can-ppap-process-cause-employee-turnover-john-m-cachat-7aayc
Can the Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) process
cause employee turnover?
I was presenting at an ASQ event in Boston about “PPAP
Software – What works and does not work and Why?” One of the participants came up to me to ask
more questions. They said, “If I can’t
find a better PPAP solution than spreadsheets, I am going to quit.”
This person was a very intelligent, energetic, and driven
individual. They further explained that
they like the intent of the PPAP process and found it very interesting, but
using spreadsheets is very unproductive.
I never thought that companies can lose very qualified
employees by asking them to do unproductive PPAP work.
Want to learn more? Reference - Production Part Approval Process
Evaluation, A Case Study at a Large OEM, master’s Thesis in the Master Program
Quality and Operations Management, by Albert Rydström Joakim Viström, January
2020. (Source)
Want a better solution than
spreadsheets?
PPAP Document Authoring Software - better than spreadsheets, but
not too complex
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8c75I3ICGNc
PPAP Simplified with Foundation,
Process Family Strategy for PF, PFMEA, CP https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upO5Ai02KWI
John M. Cachat
Harrington Group International, LLC
Email: jcachat@hgint.com
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johncachat/
HGI Software Offerings - https://hgint.com/products/
HGI Software On Demand Demos - https://hgint.com/on-demand-demos/
Too many #Quality4.0 efforts focus on the technology – IT can worry about the technology. Quality 4.0 efforts that are driven by the IT Department buying Technology without input from People about their Processes will fail. Period. QA needs to focus on the cause-and-effect relationships that help or hurt corporate objectives.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdpHtlCb_YY
FREE Whitepaper - Harrington Quality 4.0. Don't Feel Overwhelmed Feel Motivated https://hgint.com/whitepaper/ – download today
Medical Device PPAP - What Software Does and Does
Not Work & Why @ ASQ BOSCON Nov 6-7
"We spent over 5 years and $5M trying to get three
different PLM apps launched for PPAP and they all failed. It wasn't until
I heard this presentation that I understood why."
Topics include:
- Why isn't my PLM effective
- Why Supplier Portals that simply upload spreadsheets are a risk
- Why project management tools that have added simple, generic FMEA, Process
Flows, Controls Plans, etc. are ineffective
Without understanding what your people need, how the process works, the
software will fail.
This will include advice on how to get your project funded.
Sincerely,
John M. Cachat
Harrington
Group International, LLC
Mobile: 440-915-2650
Email: jcachat@hgint.com
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johncachat/
HGI Software Offerings - https://hgint.com/products/
HGI Software On Demand Demos - https://hgint.com/on-demand-demos/
Users need to speak up when corporate IT mandates tools
that will not work. Here are some things
to discuss with the Executive Team….
Ineffective Software: The software purchased might
not align with the actual needs and workflows of the users. This can result in
inefficiency and frustration as users struggle to adapt to a system that
doesn't meet their requirements.
Wasted Resources: Investing in software that doesn't
meet user needs can be a significant waste of financial and time resources. The
organization may spend money on licenses, training, and implementation, only to
find that the software is not usable.
Resistance to Adoption: Users may resist using the
software, as they weren't involved in the selection process. Resistance can
lead to low adoption rates, which, in turn, hampers the software's ROI and the
organization's ability to realize its benefits.
Lost Productivity: If the software is not
user-friendly or doesn't integrate well with existing systems, users may spend
more time trying to figure it out or working around its limitations. This can
lead to a decrease in overall productivity.
Hidden Costs: Software purchases often come with
hidden costs, such as customization, integration, and ongoing support. Without
user input, these costs may not be adequately accounted for in the budget.
Low Satisfaction: Users who are not consulted in the
software selection process are likely to be less satisfied with the tools they
are provided. Low user satisfaction can affect morale and employee retention.
Missed Opportunities: Users often have valuable
insights into their workflow and can suggest software features or solutions
that address pain points and improve efficiency. Ignoring user input may result
in missed opportunities for process improvement.
Lack of Training and Support: Inadequate
consideration of user needs can lead to a lack of appropriate training and
support for the new software. This can hinder users' ability to effectively use
the software.
To mitigate these risks, it's essential to involve users
and relevant stakeholders in the software selection process. Conducting
needs assessments, gathering user requirements, and seeking feedback can help
ensure that the software chosen aligns with the organization's goals and the
needs of its users.
John M. Cachat
jmc@peproso.com